Tietueen sitaatit

Johnson, S. (1692). An argument proving that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the. Printed for the author.

Johnson, Samuel. An Argument Proving That the Abrogation of King James by the People of England from the Regal Throne, and the Promotion of the Prince of Orange, One of the Royal Family, to the Throne of the Kingdom in His Stead, Was According to the Constitution of the. England: Printed for the author, 1692.

Johnson, Samuel. An Argument Proving That the Abrogation of King James by the People of England from the Regal Throne, and the Promotion of the Prince of Orange, One of the Royal Family, to the Throne of the Kingdom in His Stead, Was According to the Constitution of the. Printed for the author, 1692.

Johnson, S. 1692. An argument proving that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the. England: Printed for the author.